-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some cgroup cleanups #388
Merged
Merged
Some cgroup cleanups #388
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
'parent' function is confusing with parent cgroup, it's actually parent path, so rename it to parentPath. The name 'data' is too common to be identified, rename it to cgroupData which is exactly what it is. Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@huawei.com>
The former cgroup entry is confusing, separate it to parent and name. Rename entry `c` to `config`. Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@huawei.com>
We fixed some bugs and introduced some code hard to be understood, add some comments for them. Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@huawei.com>
LGTM |
1 similar comment
LGTM |
stefanberger
pushed a commit
to stefanberger/runc
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2017
Remove exec from required runtime functionalities.
stefanberger
pushed a commit
to stefanberger/runc
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2017
# digest/hashing target Most of this has spun off with [1], and I haven't heard of anyone talking about verifying the on-disk filesystem in a while. My personal take is on-disk verification doesn't add much over serialized verification unless you have a local attacker (or unreliable disk), and you'll need some careful threat modeling if you want to do anything productive about the local attacker case. For some more on-disk verification discussion, see the thread starting with [2]. # distributable-format target This spun off with [1]. # lifecycle target I think this is resolved since 7713efc (Add lifecycle for containers, 2015-10-22, opencontainers#231), which was committed on the same day as the ROADMAP entry (4859f6d, Add initial roadmap, 2015-10-22, opencontainers#230). # container-action target Addressed by 7117ede (Expand on the definition of our ops, 2015-10-13, opencontainers#225), although there has been additional discussion in a7a366b (Remove exec from required runtime functionalities, 2016-04-19, opencontainers#388) and 0430aaf1 (Split create and start, 2016-04-01, opencontainers#384). # validation and testing targets Validation is partly covered by cdcabde (schema: JSON Schema and validator for `config.json`, 2016-01-19, opencontainers#313) and subequent JSON Schema work. The remainder of these targets are handled by ocitools [3]. # printable/compiled-spec target The bulk of this was addressed by 4ee036f (*: printable documents, 2015-12-09, opencontainers#263). Any remaining polishing of that workflow seems like a GitHub-issue thing and not a ROADMAP thing. And publishing these to opencontainers.org certainly seems like it's outside the scope of this repository (although I think that such publishing is a good idea). [1]: https://github.com/opencontainers/image-spec [2]: https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/d/msg/dev/xo4SQ92aWJ8/NHpSQ19KCAAJ Subject: OCI Bundle Digests Summary Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:09:15 +0000 Message-ID: <CAD2oYtN-9yLLhG_STO3F1h58Bn5QovK+u3wOBa=t+7TQi-hP1Q@mail.gmail.com> [3]: https://github.com/opencontainers/ocitools Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
wking
added a commit
to wking/runc
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2018
gocapability has supported 0 as "the current PID" since syndtr/gocapability@5e7cce49 (Allow to use the zero value for pid to operate with the current task, 2015-01-15, syndtr/gocapability#2). libcontainer was ported to that approach in 444cc29 (namespaces: allow to use pid namespace without mount namespace, 2015-01-27, docker-archive/libcontainer#358), but the change was clobbered by 22df555 (Merge branch 'master' into api, 2015-02-19, docker-archive/libcontainer#388) which landed via 5b73860 (Merge pull request opencontainers#388 from docker/api, 2015-02-19, docker-archive/libcontainer#388) . This commit restores the changes from 444cc29. Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
wking
added a commit
to wking/runc
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2018
gocapability has supported 0 as "the current PID" since syndtr/gocapability@5e7cce49 (Allow to use the zero value for pid to operate with the current task, 2015-01-15, syndtr/gocapability#2). libcontainer was ported to that approach in 444cc29 (namespaces: allow to use pid namespace without mount namespace, 2015-01-27, docker-archive/libcontainer#358), but the change was clobbered by 22df555 (Merge branch 'master' into api, 2015-02-19, docker-archive/libcontainer#388) which landed via 5b73860 (Merge pull request opencontainers#388 from docker/api, 2015-02-19, docker-archive/libcontainer#388). This commit restores the changes from 444cc29. Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some cleanups to make cgroup code more easier to be understood: